Overview of Virtual World Sites for Kids and Tweens

November 1, 2009

Having trouble trying to find age appropriate virtual world sites for your kids?  You aren’t alone.

vwforkids1Most parents only learn about a virtual world site when their kids ask to join. So how do you determine which virtual world is age appropriate, and provides the safety options that best fit your child?

A new website called virtualworldsforkids.info is here to help. The site provides a one-stop source for finding and learning about the top virtual worlds for kids and tweens.

If you haven’t heard of virtual worlds like The Travels of Wiglington and Wenks, Stardoll, Secret builders, Poptropica, Neopets, Moshi Monsters, Frank Town Rocks, Habbo Hotel, MinyanLand, Club Penguin, Chobots, Build a Bear, or the Barbie Girls Virtual World… it may be time to start reading up on your options.

Linda


Techniques Used By Fraudsters On Social Networking Sites

October 20, 2009

Repost: Originally posted and prepared by the Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3)

Fraudsters continue to hijack accounts on social networking sites and spread malicious software by using various techniques.

  • One technique involves the use of spam to promote phishing sites, claiming there has been a violation of the terms of agreement or some other type of issue, which needs to be resolved.
  • Other spam entices users to download an application or view a video.
  • Some spam appears to be sent from users’ “friends”, giving the perception of being legitimate. Once the user responds to the phishing site, downloads the application, or clicks on the video link, their computer, telephone or other digital device becomes infected.
  • Another technique used by fraudsters involves applications advertised on social networking sites, which appear legitimate; however, some of these applications install malicious code or rogue anti-virus software.
  • Other malicious software gives the fraudsters access to your profile and personal information. These programs will automatically send messages to your “friends” list, instructing them to download the new application too.

Infected users are often unknowingly spreading additional malware by having infected Web sites posted on their Webpage without their knowledge. Friends are then more apt to click on these sites since they appear to be endorsed by their contacts.

Tips on avoiding these tactics:

  • Adjust Web site privacy settings. Some networking sites have provided useful options to assist in adjusting these settings to help protect your identity.
  • Be selective of your friends. Once selected, your “friends” can access any information marked as “viewable by all friends.”
  • You can select those who have “limited” access to your profile. This is for those whom you do not wish to give full friend status to or with whom you feel uncomfortable sharing personal information.
  • Disable options and then open them one by one such as texting and photo sharing capabilities. Users should consider how they want to use the social networking site.
  • If it is only to keep in touch with people then perhaps it would be better to turn off the extra options which will not be used.
  • Be careful what you click on. Just because someone posts a link or video to their “wall” does not mean it is safe.

Those interested in becoming a user of a social networking site and/or current users are recommended to familiarize themselves with the site’s policies and procedures before encountering such a problem.

Each social networking site may have different procedures on how to handle a hijacked or infected account; therefore, you may want to reference their help or FAQ page for instructions.

Individuals who experienced such incidents are encouraged to file a complaint at http://www.IC3.gov reporting the incident.

Linda


Talking to your kids about inappropriate Web searches

October 15, 2009

NOTE: This article was first published on Washington State Attorney General Rob McKenna’s consumer website.

Miriam, a mother of four, wrote to All Consuming with a sensitive question:

“We have a safety filter on our home computer that the family uses. It works very well. Recently, we discovered inappropriate terms that were Googled. Content was blocked, fortunately. How do we now discuss the content Googled? We do not know which child tried to access the questionable material.”

For advice, we turned to Linda Criddle. Criddle is the author of the book Look Both Ways: Help protect your family on the Internet and president of LOOKBOTHWAYS, focused on technical, educational and policy-based solutions for consumers. Criddle answers questions about Internet safety on her Web site. She helped create our Internet Safety section and teamed up with CyberPatrol to create a series of videos to educate parents and teachers about how to talk to kids about Internet safety. Here’s her response to Miriam’s question:

talkingto1“1) Get the family together, and make it a positive environment – have banana splits or something – because you don’t want to associate negative feelings with conversations about safety, or kids will be less likely to come to you when there is a real problem.

“2) Keeping a positive tone, say, ‘There are a couple of things we need to talk about to help keep the Internet a really great tool in our home. It seems someone has tried to search on some phrases that were blocked and we’d like to talk to you all about that, and maybe hear from whichever one of you tried the searches to learn why you were using those phrases.’ (Understand that the person may want to talk with you in private about their reasons.)

Criddle explained that your child may have a good reason for their search – or might just be curious and wanting to test the limits.

“Curiosity isn’t bad. Understand what their need is: Are they ready to learn more about sexuality? Some other topic? Be as supportive as possible …

“What’s good is that they searched at home. Any freak-out and punishment will teach them to go elsewhere to search, and they will not have the benefit of loving parents guiding them through the questions they have.

“I don’t know the ages of your kids, but the advice holds: When kids seek inappropriate content, it is because they have questions or curiosity about it. No matter the topic, it is OK to have questions and curiosity. What matters is how those questions are addressed – you want it to be by loving parents through the perspective of your values. What isn’t OK is for kids to feel they have to get answers from others who aren’t likely to provide the framework for understanding in an appropriate way.”

Criddle noted that if the topic searched was sexual in nature, a parent might feel a child is too young for such a conversation. But, she notes, “The reality is, they are showing curiosity, so the time to help them learn more is now. It is a ‘teachable moment.’ They will get an answer from somewhere, and you want it to be your answer – not ‘the streets’ answer.

“Listen with your inner ear and without judgment, and you’ll know how to make the incident a positive experience that brings you closer together for the next hurdle down the road of growing up. The alternative – making a negative incident out of it – is not pretty, as it inserts a wedge between you that will drive the child to seeking the information secretly from others in the future.”

Linda


Deficiencies with Existing Sex Offender Registries Increases Online Risks

September 3, 2009

Flaws with the way we label and register sex offenders’ places internet users at risk. I recently wrote about the impact this has in my blog Illinois Law Bans Sex Offenders from Social Networking Site.

Today, the Wall Street Journal published an article that again highlights the flaws inherent in our current sex-offender registry programs using the tragic case of Jaycee Dugard, the woman allegedly held in the backyard of Phillip Garrido for 18 years.

According to the article, California has been forced to acknowledge a fundamental problem with the state’s sex-offender registry: The list keeps expanding, while the number of officials who monitor sex offenders has grown at a much slower rate.

Speaking on the issue, Janet Neeley, a deputy California attorney general and member of the state’s sex offender board said, there are now so many people on the registry it’s difficult for law enforcement to effectively track them all, and “it’s more helpful for law enforcement to know…who the highest-risk offenders are,” said.

The article references a study conducted last December of roughly 20,000 registered sex offenders on parole in California. That study found 9% posed a “high risk” of reoffending, and 29% posed a “moderate-high” to “high” risk, according to Neeley. But law-enforcement officials and academics say vast resources are spent monitoring nonviolent offenders rather than keeping closer tabs on more-dangerous ones.

Failure to address the fundamental flaws in current sex-offender registry laws means we will continue to fail to protect our children and loved ones from those most likely reoffend – offline and online.

Email your elected officials today and request they review and improve the ways we determine who falls under the sexual predator label, and how we monitor those most likely to reoffend.

Linda


Social Networking’s Impact on Childhood

August 10, 2009

The results from a national poll of teens and parents conducted by Common Sense Media highlights that youth increasingly interact with friends, classmates, and people with similar interests through social networks – but parents remain largely unaware of their teen’s online activities.

Teens are deeply involved in their social networks. Over half of all teens (51%) check their social networking sites more than once a day, and 22% of teens check their pages more than 10 times a day.

In contrast, 29% of parents say their teen checks their social networking site more than once a day, and only 4% say their teen checks more than 10 times a day.

Check out other areas where the gap between what teens report and parents are aware of…

Kids also put their social networking sites to great use. In addition to the opportunity to stay in touch with a broader network of friends, they support causes, share their creativity, and get involved in issues.

Opportunities to learn, and teach

If your kids or teens are using social networking sites, but you haven’t tried these sites out for yourself, you need to jump in. These sites aren’t ‘bad’ or ‘scary’ and you may discover you really enjoy reaching out to your own friends, family, and others that share your interests.

In fact, a new Harris Poll shows that 47% of Americans between 35-44 have a social networking account, as do 41% of 45-54 yr-olds, and 24% of those 55 and older!

Once you’ve learned how to use social networking sites yourself, you’ll be in a much better position to have a conversation with your children about staying safe while having fun. To get started on your safety conversation, check out the Safety Guides on www.ilookbothways.com and search the site for more information on particular topics.

Click here to learn more about Common Sense Media

Linda Criddle


Watch Out, it’s Harry Potter Movie Malware

July 19, 2009

Unsuspecting youth, and those willing to watch illegal copies of the movie Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince on the web for free are falling victim to “a rotating selection of choice malware, including the koobface worm” according to a new alert by PC tools through their Threatfire blog.

harrypotter1

“This is headline malware,” said Mike Greene, vice president of product strategy at PC Tools. “Whenever you see a headline, you can be pretty confident you will find some hot malware.”

Using sites like Google’s Blogspot, Digg.com, and spam e-mail, criminals place enticing offers for viewing the movie and provide links to fake film websites. They are also flooding the comments sections on sites with Harry Potter keywords to get search engines to display the malicious sites in their search results.

Particularly confusing for less sophisticated users, the tools that indicate whether search engine results are safe or not indicate these sites are safe (In the example shown here, it is McAfee’s Site Advisor displaying their signature approval symbol). This is because the websites – Digg, watch-movies, livevideo, etc. – are safe. The malware is downloaded when the user clicks on a malicious link placed on these sites.

If you have kids old enough to want to watch this movie (or other popular movies) it’s time for a conversation to teach two key concepts:

  1. Copyrighted content is protected. Watching or downloading pirated copies of movies, music, or other protected content is illegal.
  2. Criminals use hot headline news and events to lure victims – whether it’s Michael Jackson, mortgage rate cuts, or highly anticipated movies.

If you are of an age where you know that watching a video copy of a movie is illegal, then getting a hefty dose of malware is your just reward.

Linda


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,753 other followers