Four Nerds Fight Facebook; Coming Soon, Individual Social Sites?

May 25, 2010

The ‘you can use my network in exchange for our right to own and monetize anything you contribute’  model of exploitation is being challenged, and if you’re smart, you can help push it into extinction.

Facebook’s under siege for their continued erosion of consumer privacy and increasing exploitation of consumer’s information. Privacy advocates, the FTC, Congress, the Canadian government, and the EU have all threatened action – and an increasing number of consumers are adding their disgust to the argument. Is an exodus in the wings? There is certainly precedent; the collapse of MySpace, once thought to be untouchable, shows how quickly a service that falls out of consumer favor can wither. When MySpace became synonymous with child predators and a lack of innovation it’s glory days were marked.

Several legal challenges to Facebook’s exploits are forming, which the company has announced their intent to fight. Yet while this battle moves slowly through the legal process, technology may significantly alter the playing field. In a move that closely parallels Facebook’s own genesis, a group of young college students is leveraging the openness of the internet and applying technical innovation to change the playing field.

It began with four ‘nerds’ creating a vision of change. After hearing a lecture by Eben Moglen, a law professor at Columbia University, describing the current model of  centralized social networks as “spying for free,” these young men were galvanized into creating a model of individual social networks that each user would ‘own’ so you have full control of your information and privacy rather than sacrificing this to Facebook or another big business.

Explaining why centralized networks like Facebook aren’t necessary, Raphael Sofaer, 19, one of the students developing this service said. “In our real lives, we talk to each other,” he said. “We don’t need to hand our messages to a hub. What Facebook gives you as a user isn’t all that hard to do. All the little games, the little walls, the little chat, aren’t really rare things. The technology already exists.”

Figuring it would take 3-4 months to create the software, called Diaspora*, the students concluded they’d need to raise $10k in funds to live on during the development. They set up a page on Kickstarter, a funding platform site that helps people with ideas get the support they need, and estimated it would take 39 days to raise their funds.  Instead, it took 12 days. As of this writing, they’ve raised over 95k. “We were shocked,” said Dan Grippi, 21,  another one of the students involved. “For some strange reason, everyone just agreed with this whole privacy thing.”

That some reason would be consumers outrage over the exploitation. You can go to Diaspora*’s Kickstarter page to add your support.

You can also join the “FacebookProtest” movement by ensuring you log off Facebook, entirely on June 6th.

You care about your privacy, it’s time to make sure your opinions are respected, and that products don’t force you to choose between access or privacy.

More articles on this topic: Four Nerds and a Cry to Arms Against Facebook. More articles online privacy:  Debunking the myth: Young Adults Do Care About Online Privacy, and Think You’ve Got Nothing to Hide? Are You Nuts?

Linda


ACLU Fights Facebook

May 14, 2010

The ACLU has sent out a call to action, encouraging consumers to increase the pressure on Facebook, highlighting the escalating tension between those who protect consumer interests and the company. I’m displaying their well crafted email in it’s entirety below. The ACLU has also created a page to help you navigate the recent Facebook changes, see Demand your dotRights for more information.

Linda


LOOKBOTHWAYS President Interviewed by MSNBC About Craigslist Murder

May 14, 2010

Herb Weisbaum, MSNBC’s Consumerman,  interviewed Linda Criddle, President of LOOKBOTHWAYS Inc., and president of the Safe Internet Alliance, in the wake of the Craigslist murder robbery about how consumers can better protect themselves when using classified sites.

Criddle highlighted the need to remain anonymous, to protect your home by arranging to meet in a public place with lots of people around, and to never go alone.

“The risk is always there when you have a person-to-person meeting,” Criddle cautions. “And the steps needed to mitigate those risks are always important.”

For small items that are easily transported arrange to meet in a public place, such as a coffee shop, at a time when there are plenty of people around. Bring someone with you – for added security and peace of mind.

Criddle says when a transaction involves a significant amount of money you might want to meet at your bank. And she’s not kidding.

“You want to be in the safest environment,” she says. “Well, this is the safest environment for you and it’s also the safest environment for the buyer. There are security cameras there, people and often a security guard.”

This way, you don’t have to walk around with a lot of cash. You can deposit it as soon as the sale is done.

Read the full article MSNBC article here:


Debunking the myth: Young Adults Do Care About Online Privacy

May 13, 2010

Contrary to popular claim that young people “are less concerned with maintaining privacy than older people are”, a UC Berkley study found “that large percentages of young adults (those 18-24 years) are in harmony with older Americans regarding concerns about online privacy, norms, and policy suggestions. In several cases, there are no statistically significant differences between young adults and older age categories on these topics. Where there were differences, over half of the young adult-respondents answered in the direction of older adults.

While participation in social networks is still high, the findings show that over half the young adults surveyed are more concerned about privacy now than they were five years ago. A finding that mirrors the percentage of people their parent’s age or older with that worry.

For example, the research found that a large majority of young adults:

  • Have refused to give information to a business in cases where they felt it was too personal or not necessary
  • Believe anyone who uploads a photo of them to the internet should get their permission first, even if taken in public
  • Believe there should be a law that gives people the right to know all the information websites know about them
  • Believe there should be a law that requires websites to delete all stored information about an individual
  • Are just as likely as older users to read privacy policies and delete browser cookies, and are nearly as likely to abort a purchase because of privacy concerns with the e-commerce site.

They study also highlights three key reasons young adults are more inclined to over-share information online. 1) young adults are shockingly uninformed about their lack of right-to-privacy 2) youth, and to a lesser extent young adults, are more inclined to take risks, bow to peer pressure, and ignore consequences, and 3) social networks, by their very design encourage increasing the amount of information shared over time.

Answering questions about privacy, the survey found that higher proportions of 18-24 year olds believe incorrectly that the law protects their privacy online and offline more than it actually does, In fact, the lack of understanding about privacy among young adults was abysmal.

A whopping 42% of young Americans answered all five online privacy questions incorrectly, and only 12% answered 3 or more of the questions correctly.

Based on these scores, the researchers concluded that “This lack of knowledge [about privacy] in a tempting environment, rather than a cavalier lack of concern regarding privacy, may be an important reason large numbers of them engage with the digital world in a seemingly unconcerned manner.”

Combining this research’s findings with another piece of research, Peer Influence on Risk Taking, Risk Preference, the study finds that youth’s developmental stage also plays a clear role in their increased willingness to take risks with privacy. Unsurprisingly, the youngest teens (13-16), show the highest likelihood to succumb to peer pressure and risk taking behaviors as the need to be cool online outweighs concerns over long-term consequences. This risk taking drops significantly as youth mature into young adults.

Compounding the risks of over-sharing among youth is the very design and dynamic of social networks that actively encourage users to share increasing the amount of information shared over time.

The study’s conclusion speaks volumes:

“In policy circles, it has become almost a cliché to claim that young people do not care about privacy. Certainly there are many troubling anecdotes surrounding young individuals’ use of the internet, and of social networking sites in particular.

Nevertheless, we found that in large proportions young adults do care about privacy… We suggest, then, that young-adult Americans have an aspiration for increased privacy even while they participate in an online reality that is optimized to increase their revelation of personal data.”

Policy discussions should acknowledge that the current business environment along with other factors sometimes encourages young adults to release personal data in order to enjoy social inclusion even while in their most rational moments they may espouse more conservative norms.

Education alone is probably not enough for young adults to reach aspirational levels of privacy. They likely need multiple forms of help from various quarters of society, including perhaps the regulatory arena, to cope with the complex online currents that aim to contradict their best privacy instincts.

Here is the link to the full research report: How Different are Young Adults from Older Adults When it Comes to Information Privacy Attitudes and Policies?

Youth do care, and businesses had better take notice.

Linda


Poll of Cybersecurity Experts Paints Grim Picture of Cyber Threats

May 6, 2010

Over 90% of leading international cybersecurity experts are extremely concerned about the security of global digital networks, and believe consumers, businesses and governments face serious threats in cyberspace, according to a poll by the EastWest Institute released over the weekend. Respondents include top-level experts from businesses and governments around the world, including the U.S., China, Russia and India.

The poll, conducted in advance of the Worldwide Cybersecurity Summit to be held in Dallas this week, also predicts a rapid increase in international tensions if cybersecurity concerns go unanswered.

“This survey demonstrates how much more we need to do to implement policies that keep pace with the breakneck speed of technological advances,” said EastWest Institute President and CEO John Edwin Mroz. “We need private-public partnerships and we need international cooperation to make cyberspace safe and secure.”

Other findings from the poll include:

NOTICE: I participated in this poll, and will be participating in the conference as the Breakthrough Groups Chair in the Media sector. I’ll follow up with another blog after the conference to provide information about outcomes and future directions.

Linda


Murder of Craigslist Seller Highlights Need for Safety Precautions

May 4, 2010

A Craigslist ad selling a diamond ring resulted in the murder of a father in front of his family last week in Washington state. The four suspects are still at large, and are suspected of a second home robbery where the homeowner was tied up and robbed after posting a Craigslist ad selling a big screen TV. Sadly, these aren’t the first attacks on buyers or sellers on classified sites. Nor will they be the last.

While most Craigslist transactions go smoothly, these horrific assaults illustrate how vital it is to take strong safety precautions when buying or selling online.

Safety tips for selling items on the Internet

Creating an ad

  • Don’t put any information that identifies you personally in the ad if it’s not strictly necessary. Keep in mind that every piece of information you post may be used for other purposes than you intended. Limit your information to limit your risk.
  • Don’t put your phone number in the ad. Keep in mind that reverse look-up directories may provide a wealth of information about you that can be used in ways you had not intended.
  • Review any photos in the ad for identifiable information, like care license plates, house numbers, street signs, etc. and mask them.

  • If the service does not provide e-mail service, then create a disposable e-mail account (such as a Hotmail account) for this purpose. In either case, pick an e-mail address that does not identify you in any way.

Communicating with a prospective buyer

  • Communicate only through e-mail until you feel comfortable that the individual’s interest is valid.
  • Be very wary of buyers who are out-of-area, as they are almost always fraudulent.
  • If anything feels “off,” stop contact.
  • When you’re comfortable that the buyer seems legitimate, ask the buyer to give you his or her phone number. (Sometimes, the area code may indicate if they are in your area.) Try the phone number to find out if it’s valid. If the person responds, chat on the phone for a bit about the item for sale and decide if the person still feels legitimate.
  • Make it clear that you will only accept cash for the item. Any other form of payment is highly likely to be fraudulent.

Showing a transportable item

  • Only agree to meet during daylight hours in a busy public place and always bring a friend to accompany you. Turn down requests to meet at your house, in an unfamiliar place, or by yourself.
  • Don’t hand over the item until you have cash in hand. Don’t accept partial payment or anything other than cash for the transaction. If the method of payment changes from your previous agreement, walk away from the deal.
  • If the potential buyer wants time to consider and comes back later, follow the same procedures for meeting. Don’t get careless the second time around. You do not know who will accompany the ‘buyer’ a second time, or if they will be armed.

Showing a non-transportable item at home

  • The less you show, the less they know. Your house provides many clues about you, your income level, your family, and so on. All of this may be useful information to crooks and predators, so it’s smart to show as little as possible.
  • Move the item into the garage or entryway, if possible. The goal is for potential buyers to see as little as necessary of your house.
  • Remove from view any items that could be stolen at the time of the visit, or that would be of interest for the potential buyer to steal later. If you have family photos on display, you may choose to put these away as well.
  • Make your meeting a two-step process. Arrange to meet during daylight hours and always have a friend be there with you.
    • First, meet in a public place close to your house. Ask for proof of identity such as a driver’s license. (That way you know who you’re dealing with if there’s is a problem.) Note the license plate number, color, and model of the buyer’s vehicle so you have it in the event there is trouble.
    • If you’re comfortable that the buyer seems legitimate, have them follow you and your friend to your house.
  • If more than one person arrives, keep them together. A common ploy is for one person to engage you with questions while another asks to use the restroom. Decline. This splits your ability to supervise and increases their ability to scope out more of your house and any items worth stealing.
  • Don’t hand over the item until you have cash in hand. Don’t accept partial payment, or anything other than cash for the transaction. If the method of payment changes from your previous agreement, decline the deal.
  • If the potential buyer wants time to consider and comes back later, follow the same procedures. Don’t get careless the second time around.

Linda


Linda Criddle interviewed on KFNN Financial News Radio

April 5, 2010

Criddle interviewed on KFNN Financial News Radio

Linda Criddle, president of Safe Internet Alliance chatted this morning with Ken and Julie on KFNN Financial News Radio in Phoenix, AZ on the need for increased focus on internet safety education in schools and in the National Broadband Plan. She also helped listeners understand the the four categories of online threats that include financial, emotional, reputational and physical threats against property or persons, and gave examples of how online threats are manifest in users of various ages.


Linda Criddle interviewed on FOX News Radio KMED “The Bill Meyer Show”

April 5, 2010

Criddle interviewed on FOX News Radio KMED “The Bill Meyer Show”

Linda Criddle, president of Safe Internet Alliance chatted this morning with Bill Meyer host of the Bill Meyer Show on Fox News Radio in Medford OR on the need for better internet safety education, the most common mistakes people make online, tips on creating safe passwords, the Alliance and it’s goals, and the need for the industry to build safer online services, and consumer education.


Warning: New Facebook AV Malware

March 30, 2010

PC Magazine is alerting consumers to a new malware attack spreading through Facebook. Found by F-Secure, the malware claims to be an anti-virus tool, that is spammed to Facebook users by friends who’ve fallen for the ploy. The malicious application asks users for access to their profile, then spreads further by sending the spam containing the malware link out to all of their friends.

Beware


Italian Court Convicts 3 Google Execs

March 17, 2010

Three Google executives where held criminally responsible for an online video of an autistic teen being bullied, in an Italian court this week. The verdict raises concerns that Google, and other Internet content services may be forced to police their content in Italy, and even beyond.

US reaction was nearly unanimous in rejecting the ruling, saying the decision threatens the principle of a free and open Internet.  The Europeans however see the decision as protecting a fundamental human right by placing the interests of the individual – in this case the autistic teen – above the rights of a business.

“This is the big principal affirmed by this verdict,” said Milan Prosecutor Alfredo Robledo, “It is fundamental, because a person’s identity is a primary good. If we give that up, anything can happen and that is not OK.”

Google execs convicted of violating Italy’s privacy laws included global privacy counsel Peter Fleischer, its senior VP and chief legal officer David Drummond and retired chief financial officer George Reyes. Each was given a six-month suspended sentence. The three were absolved on charges of defamation.

“The judge has decided I’m primarily responsible for the actions of some teenagers who uploaded a reprehensible video to Google video. “If company employees like me can be held criminally liable for any video on a hosting platform when they had absolutely nothing to do with the video in question, then our liability is unlimited,” were Fleisher’s comments.

“This verdict sets a dangerous precedent”. It also “imperils the powerful tool that an open and free Internet has become for social advocacy and change.” Drummond said in a statement.

In the United States, the Communications Decency Act of 1996 generally gives online service providers immunity in cases like this, but no such protections exist in Europe.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,753 other followers